Table of Contents
Metacognition is a relatively recent concept, used by both cognitive psychology and education sciences, which attracts attention to the role of the subject in knowledge and in obtaining a real awareness of the knowledge by using self-control, self-appreciation and self-perfecting of one’s one cognition. Metacognition is, in broad terms, thinking about thinking.
History and Definition
The father of metacognition, J.H. Flavell defines it in broad terms as being “knowledge about knowledge”, meaning that it refers to the information an individual possesses about his own cognitive processes and products.
Flavell discovered this concept while researching metamemory. Metamemory is the knowledge an individual has about the process of memorisation – for example, the fact that one knows that a certain type of information requires more repetition, that the material which is organised is better remembered and so on – and about the strategies used in memorising different types of material.
J. Delacour offers us the following definition of metacognition: “Metacognition is the capacity of representing one’s own cognitive activity, of evaluating the means and the results, of adjusting it to different types of problems or situations by deliberating choosing strategies and rules and, especially, of establishing the true or false character of some representations.”
The analyses made by J.H. Flavell continued by A.L. Brown on the process of metacognition highlighted two main components of it: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive abilities.
Metacognitive knowledge represents the declarative aspect of metacognition and it includes the beliefs and knowledge the subject has on the phenomena related to cognition. This type of knowledge is differentiated into three categories: knowledge about persons, knowledge about tasks and knowledge about strategies.
Knowledge about persons are also segmented into three types:
This part is about measuring internal aspects of a single person – made of the beliefs one possesses about himself. For example, he can think that he has a better visual memory than a echoic one (related to sounds) or that he performs better while he has to do verbal tasks than numerical or spatial tasks.
This segment is measuring aspects of different persons – are the comparisons that we make between individuals. For example, a student that is comparing himself to his deskmate and reaches the conclusion that he is better than him at, say, phisics.
This is the knowledge that we possess regarding human thinking in general. For example, we know due to the discoveries made by cognitive psychology that the level of information processing directly influences the efficiency of learning.
Equilibrium occurs when a child’s schemas can deal with most new information through assimilation. However, an unpleasant state of disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be fitted into existing schemas (assimilation).
Equilibration is the force which drives the learning process as we do not like to be frustrated and will seek to restore balance by mastering the new challenge (accommodation). Once the new information is acquired the process of assimilation with the new schema will continue until the next time we need to make an adjustment to it.
Knowledge about tasks is about knowing the objectives of the task, its requirements, its level of difficulty and, also, about being clear on the factors and conditions required in order for task to be completed.
Knowledge about strategies involve general knowledge and specific information about learning strategies and about where, when and how to use them.
All this metacognitive knowledge – metaknowledge – is stored in memory and is activated automatically or, on the contrary, voluntarily and consciously, depending on the task’s requirements.
Metacognitive abilities – the management of the mental activity – define the procedural aspect of metacognition and refer to the activities we undertake in order to control and monitor our own thinking. According to A.L. Brown, managing the mental activity is done by specific processes and strategies of planning, control/monitoring and regulation, being closely tied to the situation at hand and the task.
Planning strategies are anticipating and deciding on the way in which the task will be achieved. Schöenfeld (1987) demonstrated that the beginners in the mathematic field spend significantly less time on such planning activities than experts when trying to solve a problem. This is causing them to stray on mistaken paths which are often more costly in terms of time and money.
Control/monitoring strategies involve the surveillance of the current undergoing activity by checking the progress, the correctness of the obtained results, the identification of errors and by evaluating the strategies that were used.
Regulation strategies refer to the interventions that we decide on making after based on what we have found out in the control/monitoring phase.
The research inspired by the analysis of Flavell and Brown tried to discover the way in which these two components operate at the level of the mental processes involved in learning, as well as establishing the links between metacognition and other variables such as affectivity, motivation and cognitive style. The study of cognition has been focused on three main branches:
In the context of mental health, the interest in metacognition emerged from a concern for an individual’s ability to understand their own mental status compared to others as well as the ability to cope with the source of their distress.
These insights into an individual’s mental health status can have a profound effect on the over-all prognosis and recovery. Metacognition brings many unique insights into the normal daily functioning of a human being. It also demonstrates that a lack of these insights compromises ‘normal’ functioning. This leads to less healthy functioning.
In the autism spectrum, there is a profound deficit in Theory of Mind. In people who identify as alcoholics, there is a belief that the need to control cognitions is an independent predictor of alcohol use over anxiety. Alcohol may be used as a coping strategy for controlling unwanted thoughts and emotions formed by negative perceptions. This is sometimes referred to as self medication.
Adequate knowledge and apt utilization of Metacognition strategies will improve both instructors and learners. On top of this, as we have seen, can prevent or help the rehabilitation of mental disorders characterized by unmanaged styles and structures of thinking patterns.
We are safe to assume that a strong factor to success is self-esteem: believing you can do it, believing you deserve it, believing you will get it. Strongly related to this is the concept of self-efficacy developed by Albert Bandura. Both metacognition and self-efficacy, relatively new structures erected by modern psychology, can add to self-improvement and the journey to your personal success.