The
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
Self-discovery is just the beginning. With our AI-enhanced Positive Evolution Recommendations, every test goes beyond assessment, offering personalized, data-driven strategies and actionable solutions for applying your results to real-life growth, resilience, and success.
COMPLETE
REPORT
for The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
-
Graphical Representations of Scores
-
General Dimension Descriptions
-
Detailed DImension Descriptions
-
Book Recommendations
-
AI Positive Evolution Recommendations
approved
1200 Tests Taken
Keep in mind that your data is safe and private with us, and we don’t spam – we don’t send other emails except to keep you informed about our latest tests and other content.
This free Copenhagen Burnout Inventory gives you accurate scores for the three dimensions that predict burnout. With this scientific psychological assessment, you can see exactly how you score for Personal Burnout, Work-related Burnout, and Client-related Burnout, and you can read all there is to know about each.
Introduction to the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
Burnout is a pervasive issue affecting millions of workers across various sectors, especially in high-stress environments like healthcare, education, and social services. Defined as a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by prolonged and excessive stress, burnout can lead to reduced productivity, mental health issues, and a significant decrease in quality of life (Maslach et al., 2001). While several tools have been developed to measure burnout, the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), created by Kristensen et al. (2005), has emerged as a popular alternative due to its open-access status, simplicity, and adaptability. Unlike other tools, the CBI offers a more flexible approach by focusing on three key dimensions of burnout: personal, work-related, and client-related burnout. This page explores the conceptual framework of burnout, the development and structure of the CBI, its application across various professional settings, and its potential benefits and limitations in contemporary burnout research.
“But what happens when you work hard at something unfulfilling? It drains your spirit. It robs you of your life force. You end up depleted, depressed and angry.”
“I have a theory that burnout is about resentment. And you beat it by knowing what it is you’re giving up that makes you resentful.”
Understanding Burnout: Signs & Symptoms
Burnout is characterized by three primary symptoms: emotional exhaustion, cynicism or depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment (Maslach et al., 2001). Emotional exhaustion is often considered the core element of burnout and refers to feelings of being overwhelmed and depleted of energy. Cynicism or depersonalization reflects a sense of detachment from one’s job, often as a self-protective mechanism, while reduced personal accomplishment involves feelings of inefficacy and dissatisfaction with one’s work (Maslach & Leiter, 2016).
Kristensen et al. (2005) argued that these conceptualizations often overlook situational and environmental factors contributing to burnout. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was thus developed with an emphasis on the stressors and specific job demands that can impact employees, taking a person-centered approach. In contrast to tools like the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), which focuses on interpersonal dimensions, the CBI examines the broader effects of stress in different life contexts, making it suitable for a variety of occupational settings.
Development and Structure of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was developed as part of the Danish Project on Burnout, Motivation, and Job Satisfaction (Kristensen et al., 2005). Recognizing the need for a multidimensional burnout assessment, the authors created the CBI to measure burnout across three dimensions: personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout. Each of these dimensions captures a specific aspect of burnout, allowing for a more holistic understanding of an individual’s experience.
Exploring Personal Burnout
In recent years, burnout has emerged as a critical concern in mental health, occupational psychology, and well-being studies. While burnout was once primarily associated with professional contexts, the evolving research landscape has shown that it is also a deeply personal phenomenon. This is especially evident in the Personal Burnout dimension of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Created by Kristensen et al. (2005), the CBI is widely used in burnout research due to its unique, multidimensional approach, allowing for an in-depth understanding of personal, work-related, and client-related burnout dimensions. Personal Burnout, in particular, refers to the general, overall feeling of exhaustion and fatigue that an individual experiences, regardless of its connection to a specific job or activity (Kristensen et al., 2005). This article examines the nature and significance of Personal Burnout, explores factors contributing to it, and reviews research applications of the CBI’s Personal Burnout dimension.
Understanding Work-Related Burnout
Burnout is a complex psychological state characterized by chronic stress, emotional exhaustion, and a sense of reduced personal accomplishment. Initially identified in helping professions, burnout is now recognized as a pervasive issue across various work settings and industries (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Work-related burnout, as conceptualized in the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) developed by Kristensen et al. (2005), specifically measures exhaustion and fatigue that stem from work demands. This dimension of burnout is critical because it isolates the influence of job-related stressors on an individual’s mental and physical health, offering insights into how work environments can impact employees’ well-being. This article provides an in-depth examination of work-related burnout, exploring the CBI’s approach to measuring it, the primary causes, and implications for individual and organizational health, with recommendations for reducing its prevalence.
Understanding Client-Related Burnout
Burnout is a psychological syndrome characterized by chronic stress and emotional exhaustion, typically related to high-demand occupations (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). While burnout has traditionally been associated with workplace stress, Client-related burnout, as measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), specifically focuses on the emotional strain stemming from client interactions (Kristensen et al., 2005). This unique dimension of burnout examines how ongoing demands from clients or patients contribute to fatigue and reduced empathy, which can be particularly relevant in healthcare, social work, and education, where interpersonal demands are high. This article explores the concept of client-related burnout, examines factors contributing to it, and provides an overview of how the CBI assesses this form of burnout. Additionally, the article reviews the implications of client-related burnout on individual well-being and organizational performance, alongside strategies for intervention.
Psychometric Properties of the CBI
The CBI has been validated across various occupational groups and is recognized for its strong psychometric properties. Kristensen et al. (2005) conducted initial validation studies demonstrating the inventory’s reliability and validity. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the three scales—personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout—were found to be consistently high, indicating strong internal consistency (α > .80). Further studies have confirmed the inventory’s construct validity, showing that it correlates well with other measures of mental health, such as depression and anxiety scales (Borritz et al., 2006).
A unique aspect of the CBI is its adaptability to various cultural contexts. Researchers have applied and validated the CBI in numerous countries, including Sweden, Spain, and South Africa, with minor modifications to ensure cultural relevance. For instance, Yeh et al. (2007) found that a Taiwanese adaptation of the CBI maintained high reliability and validity, indicating the tool’s cross-cultural applicability.
Applications of the CBI
The versatility and public accessibility of the CBI have made it a popular choice for assessing burnout in various professional and non-professional settings. Its three-dimensional structure allows researchers and practitioners to identify specific areas of burnout, facilitating targeted interventions.
Benefits of the CBI
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory’s success in burnout research and organizational assessment is largely due to several key benefits that distinguish it from other burnout measures:
Limitations of the CBI
Despite its strengths, the CBI has limitations that researchers and practitioners should consider:
Future Directions for Burnout Research
As burnout research continues to evolve, the CBI offers a valuable tool for examining burnout in new and emerging contexts. For example, the rise of remote work and digital communication has introduced new dimensions to burnout, often referred to as “technostress” (Tarafdar et al., 2015). Future research could adapt the CBI to address these contemporary stressors, expanding its relevance in modern workplaces.
Additionally, more longitudinal studies using the CBI would help to clarify the causal relationships between burnout and its outcomes, such as job satisfaction, health issues, and turnover intentions. Longitudinal research would provide insights into how burnout develops over time and the effectiveness of intervention strategies in reducing burnout symptoms (Schaufeli et al., 2009).
Conclusion
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory has established itself as a valuable and accessible tool for measuring burnout, particularly due to its open-access nature and multidimensional approach. Its focus on personal, work-related, and client-related burnout allows for a comprehensive assessment that can inform targeted interventions in various professional contexts. Despite its limitations, the CBI remains a widely used tool for understanding burnout in high-stress professions, contributing to the growing body of research on workplace mental health. As work environments continue to evolve, the CBI’s adaptability and ease of use make it an essential instrument for addressing the complex issue of burnout and fostering healthier work environments.
Feedback and Reviews
Books about Burnout
If you are interested in gaining a more in-depth understanding of burnout and its dimensions, here we offer you a selection of the most relevant and valuable books that explore the subject and can aid you in your endeavour:
Reflect your thoughts
Click on the icon to see all your thoughts in the Dashboard.
It’s highly recommended that you jot down any ideas or reflections that come to mind regarding The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, including related behaviours, emotions, situations, or other associations you may make. This way, you can refer back to them on your Dashboard or Reflect pop-ups, compare them with your current behaviours, and make any necessary adjustments to keep evolving. Learn more about this feature and how it can benefit you.
References
- Borritz, M., et al. (2006). Burnout among employees in human service work: Design and baseline findings of the PUMA study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 34(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940510032275
- Dyrbye, L. N., et al. (2014). Burnout among healthcare professionals: A call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(2), 419–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2603-1
- Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720
- Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2003). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 3, 91–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(03)03003-8
- Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
- Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. In Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health (pp. 43-68). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy: Relations and consequences. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9369-1
- Yeh, W. Y., Cheng, Y., & Chen, C. J. (2007). Social patterns of pay systems and their associations with psychosocial job characteristics and burnout among paid employees in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 64(4), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.025
