Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on tumblr

This article aims at giving you a simple, yet structured encounter with the term of the Unconscious Collective and it is part of a series of posts written with regard to Jung’s Individuation process. 

Why is it important to read about and understand the basic principles that determine the inner workings of our minds, in particular about a part that some of us never consciously acknowledge or experience directly? The answer lies in the question: its power over our perception of reality is fuelled by precisely the fact that we do not practically confront it. 

Whether we understand them or not, man must remain conscious of the world of the archetypes, because in it is still a part of Nature and is connected with his own roots. A view of the world or a social order that cuts him off from the primordial images of life not only is no culture at all, but in increasing degree, is a prison or a stable. If the primordial images remain conscious in some form or other, the energy that belongs to them can flow freely into man.

This common psychological template  is so much more than simply a mysterious part of our psyche. It shapes all of our reality and it whispers significance to everything around us. We can make good use of the concept by making an effort in,  understanding, detecting and analyzing our own particular experiences in which it is playing a role so that we can fully grasp the extent of its effects over our own perception. 

Understanding the collective unconscious provides us with valuable information and solutions for overcoming often unpleasant experiences or daily enigmas that keep reoccurring. 

Short History of the Unconscious

The unconscious was first introduced in connection with the phenomenon of repression. Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) (buy his books from Amazon) investigated numerous cases of traumatic hysteria and observed situations where the behaviour of patients could not be explained without accepting the existence of thoughts or ideas of which the patients themselves were unaware of. 

He also noticed that similar behaviours could be artificially induced using hypnosis with much of the same results. This lead to the conclusion that the original ideas people’s minds possess without awareness were indeed operative and active.  

Sigmund Freud (front left) and Carl Jung (front right) at Clark University in 1909.

Although, at the time, its importance as an active subject began to be acknowledged, the unconscious was severely limited to being a segment that encapsulates suppressed experiences and, therefore, had an exclusively personal nature. Later on, Freud began to admit observing the archaic and mythological features and nuanced his initial position. But is was Carl Jung (buy his books from Amazon) who focused on studying the reoccurrence of the unconscious and elaborated several theses to prove its existence and demonstrate the empirical effects it has on our perception of what we call reality.

Defining the Collective unconscious

The term collective unconscious was originally coined by Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) and has been elaborately explained in his book Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. It represents a form of the unconscious ( the part of the mind containing memories and impulses of which the individual is not aware) common to mankind as a specie and it originates in inherited structures of the psyche, passed on from generation to generation.

It is distinct from the personal unconscious, which arises from the experience of the individual and is made of contents that were once conscious that were either forgotten or suppressed.  According to Jung, the collective unconscious is comprised of two main parts: instincts and archetypes, or primordial images and ideas.

Your visions will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes.

The Archetypes

The concept of archetype is inevitably correlated to the unconscious collective and it indicates the presence of certain forms of universality in the psyche. These forms appear in different disciplines and in each of one they bear a separate terminology, but, in essence, they define the basic ideas, representations, motives or elementary categories that stand at the foundation of our interpretation of the world. 

There are as many archetypes as there are typical situations in life. Endless repetition has engraved these experiences into our psychic constitution, not in the form of images filled with content, but at first only as forms without content, representing merely the possibility of a certain type of perception and action. When a situation occurs which corresponds to a given archetype, that archetype becomes activated and a compulsiveness appears, which, like an instinctual drive, gains its way against all reason and will, or else produces a conflict of pathological dimensions, that is to say, a neurosis.

Jung describes different types of archetypes depending on the empirical manifestations they preferred, such as motifs, events and figures.


  •  Creation
  •  Deluge
  •  Apocalypse



  • Birth
  • Death
  • Separation from parents 
  • Second pair of parents
  • Initiation
  • Marriage
  • Union of the opposites


 A much too common situation when the unconscious collective becomes uncontrollable and wreaks havoc in a person’s life is when he or she mistakenly identify themselves with a particular archetype. As a result of mindlessly embracing its emotional and cognitive particularities, they might temporarily seem to forget other perceptions, memories, behaviours and thoughts which they usually possess. This is an effect of the momentarily exclusion from the mental landscape of the contents that are not consistent with the particular archetype which, for the time being, reigns over perception.  A circumstance like this can lead to great amounts of suffering and confusion as it robs its subject of the most significant gift and responsibility of life: freedom. 

Jung’s answer to this problem is what he called the process of individuation. To achieve individuation and realise our true self, he claimed that, rather than repressing these traits, we must ‘integrate’ them by allowing them to surface from the shadow and to coexist with those in the ego, or true self. Analytical psychologists may encourage this integration, or individuation, through therapy including free association.

As a Chinese saying goes: “He who between freedom and security chooses security, deserves neither.”

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on tumblr

Freedom – a Haiku

Infinite inside
A greater, sunny freedom
an Intelligence

Connect on Social Media


© 2020 Envision your Evolution | All rights reserved | As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Scroll to Top