In this article you will read about:
Introduction: From “Pushing the River” to Moving with It
The Tao Te Ching repeatedly warns that forcing outcomes creates the very resistance we fear, whereas aligning with the situation allows impact with minimal strain—wu wei (Laozi, trans. Ames & Hall, 2003). In the Zhuangzi, this ease is embodied by artisans and swimmers who act with uncanny precision by not clinging to preconceived moves (Zhuangzi, trans. Watson, 1968). Contemporary psychology converges on the same principle: well-being and performance increase when we reduce experiential struggle, contact the present more fully, and let values—not anxiety—steer behavior (Hayes et al., 2006; Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Core Taoist ideas through a psychological lens
“Fasting of the mind” (心齋) and cognitive defusion
Zhuangzi’s “fasting of the mind” teaches sensing without clinging to evaluative chatter (Watson, 1968). That maps closely to cognitive defusion — seeing thoughts as events, not orders—central to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Hayes et al., 2006). Evidence links defusion and acceptance to greater psychological flexibility, predicting better mental health across conditions (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).
Evidence snapshot (what the science says)
Mindfulness and acceptance: Reviews suggest improvements in stress, mood, and self-regulation when monitoring is paired with acceptance (Lindsay & Creswell, 2017; Kabat-Zinn, 2013).
ACT/psychological flexibility: Across many populations, flexibility processes (acceptance, defusion, values) relate to better mental health and functioning (Hayes et al., 2006; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).
Self-determination: Autonomy-supportive contexts reliably predict well-being and persistence (Ryan & Deci, 2000, 2017).
Flow: Flow correlates with engagement and subjective well-being; challenge–skill matching and clear feedback foster it (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Five Taoist micro-practices
One-breath wu wei check (20–30s)
How: Pause wherever you are. Ask, “What is this situation asking?” Then scan quickly for one unit of unnecessary effort—tight jaw, raised shoulders, shallow breath, rehearsing what you’ll say, or trying to control others’ reactions. Release just one of these (exhale, drop the tongue from the palate, let the shoulders fall). If relevant, name the smallest fitting move (send the note, ask the clarifying question, or simply wait one more breath).
Why it works: Wu wei is not passivity; it’s frictionless fit—doing what the conditions invite with minimal extra force (Laozi, trans. Ames & Hall, 2003). Reducing micro-tensions frees attention and helps you match demand to skill, a key precondition for flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Example: Before replying to a tense message, unclench the jaw, soften the belly, and ask, “What is this thread actually asking?” → “Confirm a time.” Send a one-line confirmation first; save nuance for the call (Ames & Hall, 2003; Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Yin–yang labeling (allow → shape)
How: Name your next move as allow (yin) or shape (yang). Do them in sequence:
Allow: three slow breaths acknowledging sensations/emotion (“tight chest, heat, worry is here”).
Shape: one concrete behavior that changes the situation by 1% (ask for an example, propose one step, or set a 10-minute timer to start).
Why it works: Yin–yang is dynamic complementarity: acceptance and action generate each other. In therapy, this is “dialectics”—balance validation with change skills. Pairing present-moment monitoring with acceptance improves emotion regulation and reduces over-control; adding a small behavioral step prevents getting stuck in “just noticing” (Linehan, 1993; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).
Example: In a disagreement, first allow (“I feel defensive; three breaths”), then shape (“Can we list two options and pick one?”). (Linehan, 1993; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).
Mind-fasting cue (Zhuangzi) → value choice
How: Whisper internally, “Hearing just hearing, thinking just thinking.” For ~30–60 seconds, treat sounds and thoughts like weather—appearing and passing. When the urge to react eases, ask, “What value do I want to express right now—clarity, kindness, or courage?” Do one action that enacts it.
Why it works: Zhuangzi’s “fasting of the mind” (心齋) aims at contact without clinging to evaluative chatter (Watson, 1968). In ACT, this is cognitive defusion—seeing thoughts as events, not commands—followed by values-based action; together they increase psychological flexibility and reduce struggle with inner experience (Hayes et al., 2006).
Example: Rumination spirals during work. Cue: “thinking just thinking.” Value: clarity. Action: write a 3-bullet outline before returning to polish (Watson, 1968; Hayes et al., 2006).
Ziran alignment (make tasks feel self-chosen)
How: Before a task, write (a) which value it serves (service, mastery, integrity) and (b) one tweak that boosts autonomy: choose where (café vs. desk), when (90-minute deep work block), or how (paper first, then app). Add a tiny competence scaffold (first micro-goal) and, if useful, a relatedness cue (tell a partner your plan).
Why it works: Ziran points to unforced naturalness; actions that express our nature and the situation require less willpower (Zhuangzi, trans. Watson, 1968). Self-Determination Theory shows that when autonomy, competence, and relatedness are supported, motivation is more integrated and sustainable, with better well-being and persistence (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Example: “Write methods section → value: mastery. Autonomy tweak: outline by hand at the library. Competence: finish the Participants subsection first. Relatedness: send a check-in text when done.” (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Pu reset (beginner’s mind, ~2 min)
How: For a stubborn problem, set a two-minute timer and write three beginner questions you’ve never asked—e.g., “What if we cut the feature entirely?”, “How would a novice attempt this?”, “If I had to solve it by subtraction, what would I remove?” Circle one and run a tiny experiment within the next hour.
Why it works: Pu—the uncarved block—symbolizes low preconception/high receptivity. Suspending premature evaluation widens the option set and counters confirmation bias. In mindfulness-based work this is “beginner’s mind,” which supports curiosity, flexible problem-solving, and creativity (Kabat-Zinn, 2013).
Example: Stuck on a landing page. Beginner questions lead to: “What if the page had only one action and one benefit?” → quick Figma mock to test (Kabat-Zinn, 2013).
Use-cases
Work: Replace blanket urgency with wu-wei pacing—short sprints where challenge ≈ skill; close with values-based decisions (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Hayes et al., 2006).
Relationships: Yin–yang communication: validate first (yin), then request specifics (yang). (Linehan, 1993.)
Creativity: Pu sessions to generate options, then yang sessions to select and refine.
FAQ
Most frequent questions and answers
No. It’s do what fits. Taoist sources point to precise effectiveness that looks effortless because it wastes no energy (Laozi, trans. Ames & Hall, 2003).
Taoism adds a systems/relational lens—yin–yang, fit, and timing—while mindfulness focuses on attention and acceptance. They complement each other (Kabat-Zinn, 2013; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).
Modern constructs paralleling Taoist ideas—flow, self-determination, acceptance/defusion, dialectics—are supported by decades of research (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Ryan & Deci, 2017; Hayes et al., 2006; Linehan, 1993).
Taoism & Psychology Book Recommendations
Here is a collection of the best books on the market related to Taoism & Psychology:
Our commitment to you
Our team takes pride in crafting informative and well-researched articles and resources for our readers.
We believe in making academic writing accessible and engaging for everyone, which is why we take great care in curating only the most reliable and verifiable sources of knowledge. By presenting complex concepts in a simplified and concise manner, we hope to make learning an enjoyable experience that can leave a lasting impact on our readers.
Additionally, we strive to make our articles visually appealing and aesthetically pleasing, using different design elements and techniques to enhance the reader’s experience. We firmly believe that the way in which information is presented can have a significant impact on how well it is understood and retained, and we take this responsibility seriously.
Click on the icon to see all your thoughts in the Dashboard.
Your Thoughts about Taoism & Psychology
It’s highly recommended that you jot down any ideas or reflections that come to mind regarding all-or-nothing-thinking, including related behaviours, emotions, situations, or other associations you may make. This way, you can refer back to them on your Dashboard or Reflect pop-ups, compare them with your current behaviours, and make any necessary adjustments to keep evolving. Learn more about this feature and how it can benefit you.
References
- Ames, R. T., & Hall, D. L. (2003). Dao De Jing: A philosophical translation. Ballantine Books.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
- Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living (Rev. ed.). Bantam.
- Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
- Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT). Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.004
- Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
- Watson, B. (1968). The complete works of Chuang Tzu. Columbia University Press.
