Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

During the 1970′, at Geneva, a new perspective on cognitive development has begun to emerge. The self-defined school of socio-genetical psychology advanced theories that represented a challenge addressed to the spirit of genetical epistemology.

Willem Doise, Gabriel Mugny and Jean Claude Deschamp, to name but a few of the representatives, declare that social interactions constitute the privileged setting which gives birth to the intellectual acquisitions of the child. There is a direct cause and effect link between social interaction and individual cognitive development.

The ontogenesis of our conscious self and the concinnity of our shadow spring directly from our seedlings saturated in the rich milieu of our nation’s external and internal conflicts and our personalized social, political, and cultural interactions.

The Tripolar Ego-Alter-Object Perspective

The studies of the mentioned psychologists on the evolving intellect aim at clearing the path for the shift from a bipolar ego-object psychology to a tripolar ego-alter-object psychology. This mutation is viewed as necessary because it is simply more in accordance with reality. In other words, the thesis that regards cognitive development as a result of merely the child’s interaction with his or her environment – see Jean Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development – should be replaced with one that admits to the fact that in certain key moments of mental growth, cognitive acquisitions have their origin in the confrontational actions or opposing ideas that occur between individuals.

Main Postulates of the Theory

Social interaction plays a generative role which manifests in the form of a spiral; if the social interaction allows for the child to elaborate new cognitive instruments, these new instruments allow, in turn, for the child to participate in more complex social interactions, thus favouring a new cognitive restructuring. 

The psychosocial theory of intellectual development proposed by Doise and Mugny (1998) is:

  • opposing epistemologic individualism;
  • aiming at explaining the mechanisms that help articulate the intellectual and social dynamics;
  • surpassing the workings of imitation, reaching toward social activism and postulating a socio-interactionist and socio-constructivist view. 
We could say that this outlook is compatible with the conception around which most of Lev Vygostsky’s work is built. There is, however, an important difference regarding the way in which social interaction is perceived. If Vygotsky’s theories refer to a guided or tutelaged interaction which takes place between a mentor and a novice (an asymmetrical interaction), the genetic social interactionists describe a symmetric interaction in which equal partners cooperate in resolving a problem and focus on reaching a shared response.
Experimental studies have shown that in order for the cognitive progress to develop, social interactions must provoke a socio-cognitive conflict.

As much as we complain about other people, there is nothing worse for mental health than a social desert.

The Role of the Socio-cognitive Conflict

The socio-cognitive conflict is defined by diverging initial responses given by partners that are faced with a problem situation which has to be countered with a mutually accepted method of solving.

The socio-cognitive conflict integrates two types of conflict:

  • an interindividual conflict – determined by the divergence between the initial responses of the two;
  • an intraindividual conflict – which arises as a result of becoming aware of the differences between the responses.
So that it proves itself efficient and to produce the expected individual progress, a sociocognitiv conflict must carry out certain conditions:
  • the presence of different initial reponses to the same problem and the obligation of reaching a common response in order to counter it;
  • the participants must already possess certain cognitive and sociocognitive abilities;
  • the interaction must give birth to an active engagement on both sides.

Nothing of me is original. I am the combined effort of everyone I've ever known.

Cooperative Learning Groups

The researches conducted by the Geneva School have attracted the interest of specialists in the education psychology field. For example, D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson (1983), which were mainly interested in studying group learning activities in the scholar and academic contexts, decide on attributing a major role to the socio-cognitiv conflict. For them, the active participation of cooperative learning groups inevitably lead to conflicts between the ideas, opinions and information held by the members of the groups. If it is conducted in a constructive manner, the controversy can favorise curiosity and uncertainty in one’s previous held beliefs, as well as an active search for complementary information, which, in turn, brings about a better memorisation of the learning material. It has been demonstrated that people who work or compete in individual situations don’t have the opportunity to participate in such processes and this is directly affecting their performance.

The two authors have identified five elements that define the cooperative learning groups:

  • face-to-face interaction;
  • positive interdependence – the students support and explain to each other;
  • individual responsibility – although they learn together, each one of them demonstrates what he or she gained
  • possessing some cooperative abilities
  • group processing – the group members must monitorize both the operation and the group relationships and, also learn about the group dynamics.


Although the theory’s main ideas have been proven to be accepted, there are a series of rules that must be accomplished so that the socio-cognitive conflict is followed by the desired mental growth. One of those is the regulative intention which puts out the conflict.

Work on socio-cognitive conflict and cooperative learning groups has shown that confrontations can benefit learning when conflict is regulated in an epistemic manner, but can hinder learning when conflict is merely relational. In other words, if one part of the interaction is simply agreeing with the other out of compliancy or desire to put an end to discussions, both parties fail to improve their abilities. 

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Featured Image for Jerome Bruner's Theory of Sociocultural Development - Collage Artwork made by Mathieu Bouriel

Jerome Bruner’s Constructivist Theory of Development

The American psychologist Jerome S. Bruner, strongly influenced by the work of Russian psychologist Lev Vygostky, further developed and applied his ideas in the field of education. Bruner declared that Vygotsky has convinced him about the impossibility of understanding the concept of human development in any other way than as a process of assistance, of collaboration between child and adult, where the adult is taking up the role of a sociocultural mediator. Due to its distinct features, we consider the theory to be a sociocultural constructivist one.

| Read Now |
Featured Image for Anima & Animus: Archetype Anatomy - Monochrome Photograph of a woman standing behind a man

Anima & Animus: Archetype Anatomy

Anima and animus are gender specific archetypal structures in the collective unconscious that are compensatory to conscious gender identity.

One of the most complex and least understood features of his theory, the idea of a contrasexual archetype, developed out of Jung’s desire to conceptualize the important complementary poles in human psychological functioning. From his experiences of the emotional power of projection in his patients and in himself, he conceived first of the anima as a numinous figure in a man’s unconscious.

| Read Now |
Featured Image for The Wise old man: Archetype Anatomy - Monochrome Photography of an old man

The Wise Old Man: Archetype Anatomy

The wise old man (also called senex, sage or sophos) is an archetype as described by Carl Jung, as well as a classic literary figure, and may be seen as a stock character. The wise old man can be a profound philosopher distinguished for wisdom and sound judgment.

In literature, the sage often takes the form of a mentor or a teacher to the hero, playing a crucial role in the hero’s journey. The sage archetype may be portrayed by a God or a Godess, a magician or wizard, a philosopher or an advisor.

The sage is usually depicted as a wise old man or an old crone with great foresight, who offers measured advice and guidance to help the hero in his quest, and at the same time letting the hero choose his path towards destiny.

| Read Now |
Featured Image for What is Metacognition? History, Classification and Strategies - Collage Artwork depicting a mirrored woman communicating with herself

What is Metacognition? History, Classification & Strategies

Metacognition is a relatively recent concept, used by both cognitive psychology and education sciences, which attracts attention to the role of the subject in knowledge and in obtaining a real awareness of the knowledge by using self-control, self-appreciation and self-perfecting of one’s one cognition. Metacognition is, in broad terms, thinking about thinking.

| Read Now |
Featured Image for Dealing with Impostor Syndrome: Here is what you need to know - Photograph of a man holding a mask

Dealing with Impostor Syndrome: Here is what you need to know

Impostor Syndrome (also known as impostorism, fraud syndrome or the impostor experience) is a pervasive feeling of insecurity, self-doubt, or fraudulence despite often overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It usually strikes intelligent and successful individuals and it often comes to surface after an especially notable accomplishment – be it an admission to a prestigious university, winning an award, earning a promotion or obtaining public acclaim.

| Read Now |
Featured Image for Quick Guide: The Active Imagination Technique; Salvador Dali Surrealist painting depicting a dream

Active Imagination Technique: Quick Guide

Active imagination is a process in Jungian psychology used to bridge the gap between the conscious and unconscious minds: opening oneself to the unconscious and giving free rein to fantasy, while at the same time maintaining an active, attentive, conscious point of view. The process leads to a synthesis that contains both perspectives, but in a new and surprising way.

| Read Now |

Envision your Evolution

| Read yourself to health |

Infinite inside
A greater, sunny freedom
an Intelligence

Envision your Evolution 2020 © All Rights Reserved
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Scroll to Top